Amazing girl!!!! [Archive]

ZeBaron

06-27-2003, 03:15 PM

Originally posted by Invisible
I don't want to get banned so I won't post a link. But this is so amazing it's insane. If you go to ***********.*** and click on the first two links (soft and tender), you'll see the most amazing chick. Amazing.:bulb:

click on the link "back for more" a few below "soft and tender." truly amazing, hottest girl ever.:confused: :eek:

Obispo

06-27-2003, 04:19 PM

If you post the url, even if it does not show as a hyperlink, it's still posting links to porn.

Ganon

06-27-2003, 04:19 PM

Uh-oh... asterisks... who is this the work of?(Funny, I was about to say "Well actually, the mods are usually pretty slack when it comes to this, as long as they have SOME clothes on...")

Ganon

06-27-2003, 04:20 PM

Originally posted by Obispo
If you post the url, even if it does not show as a hyperlink, it's still posting links to porn.

Ok, so maybe not ALL the mods are slack...

Wormboy

06-27-2003, 04:23 PM

Ah, back in the days of hormones>brains :D

Obispo

06-27-2003, 06:19 PM

Originally posted by Ganon
Uh-oh... asterisks... who is this the work of?(Funny, I was about to say "Well actually, the mods are usually pretty slack when it comes to this, as long as they have SOME clothes on...")

They do have some clothing on in some of the pictures....

Ganon

06-27-2003, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by Obispo
They do have some clothing on in some of the pictures....

I take it you checked out the link before responding, then? Good move. Cheers. :)

Invisible

06-28-2003, 12:37 PM

You are being formally notified of banishment from the Atari community for making this post: http://ataricommunity.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4027774#post4027774

We allow for 15 Total Warning Points and you are now over the limit.

This post is classified as Offensive Material! The rules and definitions of the above infraction can be found here: http://ataricommunity.com/rules.html

Please note that we do not allow for appeals due to the traffic of the board we cannot review each case. Also note that reregistering on the board is not allowed and once we notice you have returned we will remove your access again.

We suggest you join a community board for your favorite game that does not maintain as strict of rules.

Best Regards,

Atari Forums team.

(me)
Well, I'd like to confirm that it wasn't a link. It was the name of the website. And by the way, it was not xxx porn. They were photos of a woman who was not doing anything explicit. Just naked photos. By not providing the link, I was not forcing someone to click on "porn".

Nessus

06-28-2003, 01:12 PM

He still wasn't banned?! :sour:

Varky

06-29-2003, 10:27 PM

Originally posted by Nessus the Lad
He still wasn't banned?! :sour:

Man, way to get our hopes up eh?

Aegeri

06-29-2003, 10:30 PM

Well, he didn't directly post a link :/

Obispo

06-30-2003, 09:11 PM

Posting the URL for a website is the same damn'd thing as posting a link to the same site.

So you have to actually type it in your address bar, or copy the text, S-F-W?

The rule state NO PORN as an absolute, not "no links to porn". And posting a link to porn, or posting the web address is the same as posting porn on this site.

Ganon

06-30-2003, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by Obispo
Posting the URL for a website is the same damn'd thing as posting a link to the same site.

So you have to actually type it in your address bar, or copy the text, S-F-W?

The rule state NO PORN as an absolute, not "no links to porn". And posting a link to porn, or posting the web address is the same as posting porn on this site.

While it may be the same in the eyes of the rules, it is not in effect the same. By posting a picture, the person doesn't even have to click anything but the thread title to be exposed, and therefore that shouldn't be allowed. But by posting the LINK, the person has to click it first, therefore taking an action, and although there are plenty of see-a-link-must-click-its out there, well, they need to get over that.

RandBlade

07-01-2003, 07:51 AM

I believe what Invisible did here was silly and deserved to be removed, but I don't think he should get warning points. He didn't post an image, furthermore he didn't even (from what I gather) post a direct link either. Yes he did post an indirect link and that was wrong, but not something I think he should get points for. It was clear by him doing it indirect that he was I believe trying to be within the rules, furthermore I don't recall ever in my time here seeing this happen before, so it was a silly mistake, but an innocent one I believe, not a deliberate attempt at breaking the rules, so I think he should get a warning, but no punishment of warning points.

Wormboy

07-01-2003, 02:08 PM

I disagree. I got my two WLPs for swearing when I first joined. nothing bad, but standard mispelled fecal matter reference :D

No harm intended, but I hadn't read the forum rules. ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law, as has been well-established in legal circles, I believe.

As for Ganon's comment--pfft. Not XXX? So? Porn is porn. women without clothes on is pornography, albeit soft-core.

Link intact or not doesn't matter all all. He posted a link to porn, whether you can click it or have to copy and paste

Invisible seems to be a nice guy, but this was just foolish. I don't think permanent bannage is warranted, but he certainly earned a stack of WLPs. Perhaps a lesson was learned.

Invisible

07-01-2003, 02:49 PM

Some of you still don't understand. I posted something like marke****ch.com
That's not a link. It's the name of a website. Seems I could post marke****ch here and people would believe I posted a link to a website. It's not.

Wormboy

07-01-2003, 03:03 PM

But you posted the name of a porn website.

It's still a book seller if you leave the "www" off of amazon.com

besides, you wanted us to look at a particular naked girl, I assume. That's pornography. Sorry dude.

Obispo

07-01-2003, 03:14 PM

marke****ch.com is the Domain name for the webserver 206.146.143.69.

Unlike 206.146.143.69, the other domain name you posted had a great many pictures of Semi Clothed and nude women (in provacative and titilating poses) hosted on it. As the models were in poses, clothing and surroundings intended to arouse the viewer in a sexual manner, the fall under the definition of porn.

:Originally posted by Ganon:
While it may be the same in the eyes of the rules, it is not in effect the same. By posting a picture, the person doesn't even have to click anything but the thread title to be exposed, and therefore that shouldn't be allowed. But by posting the LINK, the person has to click it first, therefore taking an action, and although there are plenty of see-a-link-must-click-its out there, well, they need to get over that.

The rules do not apply to the action of the person viewing the link, clicking it, or what-have-you. They apply to the action of posting it to these forums. If you read the first message in this thread, he was well aware that posting a direct hyperlink would get him banned. He went ahead however and posted the domain name. It shows that he was aware that what he was doing was not appropriate for these forums and that is why he got warning points.

Invisible

07-01-2003, 09:40 PM

Originally posted by Obispo
(in provacative and titilating poses)

:haha: :haha: :haha:

Ah well, whatever. I won't argue but if I would have posted the direct link, you would have seen this woman just sitting half naked. Not like she was a prostitute or anything. But, what the hell am I saying? I like beach pics anyway. :D

Ziggy Stardust

07-02-2003, 03:45 AM

Originally posted by Obispo
the other domain name you posted had a great many pictures of Semi Clothed and nude women (in provacative and titilating poses) hosted on it.
Not being english I wonder what a titilating pose is, provocative I can understand.

And I think we can be sure Obispo researched the contents of the site thouroughly before he came to his ..... conclusion.

termite

07-02-2003, 09:04 AM

Titilating just means it is intended to or does turn someone on, you know arouse someone.

There are plenty of places to post this stuff - about 90% of the Net in fact - but this is not the place.

I'm surprised to see Randy defending it, he knows the rules as well as anyone - he even wrote the previous FAQ.

Whether or not it was a link is irrelevant, if you walk into a room with a closed box and say "I've got something really cool in here." you can pretty much guarantee everyone will want a look in the box. Giving the name of the site is basically giving them a box and telling them to look inside IMO.

RandBlade

07-02-2003, 01:17 PM

Originally posted by termite
I'm surprised to see Randy defending it, he knows the rules as well as anyone - he even wrote the previous FAQ.Agreed I do know the rules, and if you read what I wrote again I did not defend his actions. I said they were wrong, silly and Obispo was right to remove the link. However what he did was an attempt to play within the rules, he screwed up and it did break the rules and I'd have thought that it was breaking the rules, but he thought it was OK. Furthermore as I said I do believe such a very indirect link (even adding the www. was not enough, he then gave directions too of what to click once there I believe from reading the already censored post) is unprecendented. There was no prior experience I know of that someone did this and had it removed.

I do believe it broke the rules. I just think that as he gave clear warning as to what it was, it was an attempt to play in the rules and unprecedented AFAIK that it should simply have been removed and a warning given, not a punishment too. If it happened a second time then a serious punishment or even direct banning should have been given.

I'm not disagreeing with the fact that it was against the rules, I'd thought it was too and I said in my post it was "silly" not just against the rules.

Invisible

07-02-2003, 04:41 PM

Originally posted by Ziggy666
I think we can be sure Obispo researched the contents of the site thouroughly before he came to his ..... conclusion.

Yeah, and I bet he told his boss he was doing research. Hahahahaa!!!:haha:

termite

07-03-2003, 05:25 AM

Originally posted by RandBlade

lotsa stuff

Fair enough, Randy, I see your point - he broke the rules but he did try not to break them overtly.

Perhaps he could look at my tax return for me.;)

RandBlade

07-03-2003, 08:33 AM

Originally posted by termite
Perhaps he could look at my tax return for me.;) Nah, for that you need Aes Sedai. Someone who can bend the truth so much it seems they're lieing, without actually ever telling a lie.

MASTERofSEX

08-06-2004, 10:41 PM

Why can't members post links to porn sites?

Lily

08-06-2004, 11:35 PM

Originally posted by MASTERofSEX
Why can't members post links to porn sites?

Because the rules say so and they pay for the bandwidth.

Vive_le_Quebec

08-07-2004, 06:05 AM

Originally posted by Lily
Because the rules say so and they pay for the bandwidth.

Yeah, it costs them 15k a month for the bandwidth so we can chat for fun. :p

BTW, how long did it take you to find this year old thread MasterofSex?

Minx

08-07-2004, 07:50 AM

It's the scourge of the DBZ forums, come to haunt us once more. Somoen please ban masterofsex, returnoftheMHM, etc, etc, for the love of glod.

Gholam

08-07-2004, 11:06 AM

Oh bloody hell he's found his way here to? Damnit!

Spawnie

08-07-2004, 12:53 PM

damn. someone pm me the link!

;)

Loki

08-07-2004, 01:01 PM

Looks like Obispo's gone for good. :( His bishop avatar is gone as is his title.

neoflame

08-07-2004, 10:31 PM

Originally posted by Hellspawn King
damn. someone pm me the link!

;)
Hey me too damnit :p

Varky

08-08-2004, 12:11 AM

ha ha, invisible was such a pervert.

MASTERofSEX

08-08-2004, 12:42 AM

I am him, I have return.

Vive_le_Quebec

08-08-2004, 03:31 AM

Originally posted by Minx
It's the scourge of the DBZ forums, come to haunt us once more. Somoen please ban masterofsex, returnoftheMHM, etc, etc, for the love of glod.

Remember, you have to be a “bad” boy in order to be banned. You can’t call for wholesale banning of a bunch of people without knowing who they really are.

Originally posted by Hellspawn King
damn. someone pm me the link!

;)

The way the site works is when the links are old enough, you have to pay for access to those contributions. Even if I posted a link, you wouldn’t see it. Only current ones are free. (Actually, there’s an explicit section on that site that you also have to pay for. The free section is used to advertise the site.)

Originally posted by MASTERofSEX
I am him, I have return.

You sir, are a funny man.

Minx

08-08-2004, 07:31 AM

Originally posted by Vive_le_Quebec
Remember, you have to be a “bad” boy in order to be banned. You can’t call for wholesale banning of a bunch of people without knowing who they really are. FFS, this is his fifth or sixth account man. And the first three or so got banned. This lad makes the anime freaks at DBZ seem like paragons of clarity and intelligence.

Gholam

08-08-2004, 10:54 AM

And that is often a very hard task.

The Holy One

08-08-2004, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by Minx
FFS, this is his fifth or sixth account man. And the first three or so got banned. This lad makes the anime freaks at DBZ seem like paragons of clarity and intelligence.
..............:eek:

MASTERofSEX

08-08-2004, 11:51 AM

It's more like my 15th acount

The Holy One

08-08-2004, 11:54 AM

With all that forum spanking you can't be the master of sex....master of masturbation maybe.....:bulb:

Vive_le_Quebec

08-08-2004, 12:26 PM