PDA

View Full Version : Six Flags Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy


-LiLDaReDeViL5-
06-13-2009, 12:38 PM
From the Wall Street Journal:

Six Flags Inc., the world's largest regional amusement-park company, filed for bankruptcy protection early Saturday.

The theme-park company, shouldering more than $2 billion in debt, had been racing to restructure outside of court, negotiating with lenders, selling parks and laying off staff. But it couldn't outrun the deteriorating economy and a looming $288 million payment due preferred shareholders this August, along with $31 million in unpaid dividends.

Six Flags, whose theme parks attract more than 25 million visitors a year, said it filed Chapter 11 with a prearranged reorganization plan that garnered unanimous approval from its lenders' steering committee. The plan would deleverage Six Flags' balance sheet by about $1.8 billion and eliminate more than $300 million in preferred stock obligations, the company said.

Low consumer confidence kept attendance down at Six Flags' 20 parks, which dot several cities across North America, including Chicago, San Antonio and Mexico City. Revenue fell and the company delayed certain debt payments.

Six Flags' Chapter 11 filing marks a setback for investor Daniel Snyder, the Washington Redskins football team owner who took control of the theme-park company in a contentious proxy fight in 2005 and installed his own management team. The bankruptcy would likely wipe out Mr. Snyder's stake.

In a statement on the filing, Six Flags didn't address Mr. Snyder's stake. A Six Flags spokeswoman didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.

In the midst of his battle to wrest control of the company, Mr. Snyder wrote a letter to Six Flags stockholders saying they "would have been better off hiding their money under a mattress" than investing in the company under its prior management.

"The current management team inherited a $2.4 billion debt load that cannot be sustained, particularly in these challenging financial markets," said Mark Shapiro, Six Flags' chief executive, in a statement. He said operations of the company's parks would be unaffected by the filing and that Chapter 11 protection was sought solely to "clean up the balance sheet."

Also losing out on Six Flags' financial rollercoaster: Microsoft Corp. founder Bill Gates, whose Cascade Investment LLC owned about 10.2 million shares.

Six Flags failed to get last-minute concessions from lenders out of court. A deadline for debt holders to swap certain notes for equity expired Friday night. The park operator had extended that deadline by more than two weeks after falling well short of a 95% targeted acceptance rate.

Mr. Snyder's team, led by Mr. Shapiro, a former ESPN executive, had made some progress of late. Six Flags sold 10 parks and laid off about 300 workers. It tried to make its parks more "family friendly," banning smoking in most areas.

Last year, Six Flags brought in more cash than it spent for the first time. The company's losses narrowed in 2008 to $112.9 million, about half those of a year earlier. Sales nudge 5% higher to about $1.02 billion.

But last summer's record fuel prices, plunging consumer confidence and deteriorating credit markets weighed on Six Flags' balance sheet. The company lost even more money when the recent swine flu outbreak forced a temporary closure of its park in Mexico City.

A few months ago, Six Flags hired law firm Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP to prepare for a bankruptcy filing. It also hired Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin to negotiate with creditors.

How does this affect you FAQ. (http://www.sixflags.com/national/footernav/frequentlyaskedquestions.aspx)

As of right now, all parks remain open for 2009. Also as of now any new attractions that were planned are also going to be built.

I'm not concerned, GADV isn't going anywhere. We'll probably see GADV, Magic Mountain, Great America, Discovery Kingdom, and Georgia stay open. The rest, sorry, I can't see staying.

Wild 1
06-13-2009, 12:59 PM
I could see the larger parks staying open and some of the small parks getting picked up by PARC, Merlin or some other small amusment park companies but not Cedar Fair, they already are trying to sell two of their parks!

Alpengeist
06-13-2009, 04:18 PM
I'm not concerned, GADV isn't going anywhere. We'll probably see GADV, Magic Mountain, Great America, Discovery Kingdom, and Georgia stay open. The rest, sorry, I can't see staying.


The Texas park(s) aren't going anywhere.

-LiLDaReDeViL5-
06-13-2009, 04:21 PM
How so? They haven't gotten anything big recently.

Six Flags needs to keep two or three east coast parks (Georgia, Gadv, and NE), two midwestern parks (SFSTL and SFGAM) and two western coast parks open. That's 7 parks.

Alpengeist
06-13-2009, 04:44 PM
How so? They haven't gotten anything big recently..

What's that have to do with anything. Just because a park doesn't get a 25 million dollar ride, it doesn't mean it will be one of the parks to go. BTW, both parks have received new attractions over the last couple of years, just not a Kingda Ka, Goliath, or Tatsu. Oh wait, one of the parks did get a Goliath, didn't they?

Six Flags needs to keep two or three east coast parks (Georgia, Gadv, and NE), two midwestern parks (SFSTL and SFGAM) and two western coast parks open. That's 7 parks.


Six Flags needs to keep the parks they feel will help turn the company around and I have more faith in the Texas parks than I do for a good number of the others parks.

-Bolt-
06-13-2009, 07:50 PM
I'm glad Six Flags took this step, actually. It's good to see them acknowledging their problems and working to get them solved. As long as they make proper decisions on which parks to keep open that will sustain the company later on, they'll make it out alive.

But please keep SFDK open, KTHANXBAI!

disneyland123
06-13-2009, 09:51 PM
I really hope this dosen't end up as a Chapter 7 or like a Hard Rock Park scenario. Six Flags, in my eyes, is really trying to change from the plopping solution, as far as I can see.

It's good that they're deciding to restructure however.

JungleGuy
06-13-2009, 10:01 PM
SFSTL Sucks Long Live SFOT

I hope Cedar Fair doesn't go bankrupt and have to close Worlds of Fun and ValleyFair.

randomperpie
06-13-2009, 10:14 PM
I'd say the Texas Parks would stay for sure, I still don't they should have gotten rid of Astroworld. SFA, SFKK SFM and La Ronde should all be sold. SFNE I think would be a boarder line park, without Bizzaro, it would be nothing....

wabigbear
06-13-2009, 10:29 PM
Why do they necessarily have to get rid of ANY parks? They aren't Chrysler. Not all businesses in bankruptcy sell off assets, some just restructure debt. Filing just gives them breathing room and if they can get rid of some of their debt, which may position them for when the recession eases.

-LiLDaReDeViL5-
06-13-2009, 10:34 PM
Why do they necessarily have to get rid of ANY parks? They aren't Chrysler. Not all businesses in bankruptcy sell off assets, some just restructure debt. Filing just gives them breathing room and if they can get rid of some of their debt, which may position them for when the recession eases.
There has been a strong rumor that if Six Flags had to, SFDK would be the very first to go.

Alpengeist, sure all parks got new rides but by Six Flags putting in a Goliath, a Kingda Ka, or a Tatsu, it shows that they are willing to invest into those parks and give them the big coasters.

Krakatoa_Coo
06-13-2009, 11:26 PM
I read something about Six Flags at some news websites and whatever and it said that SFNE was a really high profitable park, i mean, there are only about 2 to 4 amusement parks up here in New England and the best one up here is SFNE. The others are small and have no good thrills.

I then agree that SFNE would be nothing without Bizarro.

TPM INC
06-13-2009, 11:53 PM
I call this the tri-park selection:

SFMM SFGA and SFOG

Then 1 park in each time zone:

Eastern - SFNE
Pacific - SFDK
Central - SFFT (Texas Giant needs to go here, for this park to have a chance with the trio)
Central 2 (Since there are no Mountain parks) - SFSL

That's seven parks that I believe will be left (the first three being the biggest one's). Dubai is an exception as of right now.

I read something about Six Flags at some news websites and whatever and it said that SFNE was a really high profitable park, i mean, there are only about 2 to 4 amusement parks up here in New England and the best one up here is SFNE. The others are small and have no good thrills.

I then agree that SFNE would be nothing without Bizarro.

Really now... So your saying that Scream, Batman, Thunderbolt, and Cyclone can't handle them selfs, not to mention that their water park is one of the best in the country.

Krakatoa_Coo
06-14-2009, 12:32 AM
^ well, you got me there!

i agree on those 7 parks but st louis is in central.

TPM INC
06-14-2009, 10:04 AM
^ Fixed!!

Alpengeist
06-14-2009, 11:11 AM
Alpengeist, sure all parks got new rides but by Six Flags putting in a Goliath, a Kingda Ka, or a Tatsu, it shows that they are willing to invest into those parks and give them the big coasters.
Actually those rides were initiated by the old management, thus one of the many reasons Six Flags finally filed for Chapter 11.


Just curious, but where did this "7 parks" come from? I believe Six Flags will keep the parks that will make them a profit, whether it's 5, 6, 7, or all of them.

Here's how I break them down in groupings: (Note: Not necessarily based on size of park or attendance, more based on future profits/potential)

Top Tier Parks-

SFGAm
SFGAdv
SFMM
SFOT
SFFT
SFOG

Middle Tier Parks-

SFNE
SFDK
SFStL
SFMexico
Great Escape
La Ronde

Low Tier Parks-

SFA
SFKK

In Limbo/Probably never reopen-

SFNO

I would really be surprised if any of the top tier parks on my list were sold, unless someone offers a ridiculous amount of money. ...Which I don't see happening in this current economy. Heck, if I was looking into buying any parks, I would be calling Inbev/Busch, not SF.;)

disneyland123
06-15-2009, 05:21 AM
Really? I would consider Fiesta Texas as a Middle Tier, but whatever.

I think one of the Texas parks should go. SFoT would most likely be kept because it was the first SF park.

Alpengeist
06-15-2009, 12:32 PM
I put SFFT in the top tier because of the comments made by Shapiro on more than one occasion, stating how much he liked the park and how he would like to make it a model to follow for the other parks in the chain. Again it's not just about size, it's also about quality and potential too.

Harpo
06-15-2009, 01:02 PM
While they are currently saying that they don't intend to lay off any people or sell any parks, keep in mind that the plans now need to be decided upon by a bankruptcy judge. There's no way to know for certain what will happen.